Talk:Badgam district

Contest PROD

I am not sure why the nominator wants this article to be deleted. The topic is same as that of Budgam district. As this sounds like a legitimate probable spelling, its good to simply redirect it that way. Why delete? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:54, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like WP:COMMONSENSE to me. Why didn't I think of that? I've removed the PROD template and will redirect this page to Budgam district. I'm not entirely sure which name is actually correct, since Budgam is the title on the official website but I noticed the Census spelled it Badgam. I guess that discussion will happen when someone comes along who cares. Rutebega (talk) 02:07, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Budgam should not be deleted, because even census 2011 data refer to the district with this spelling. --GDibyendu (talk) 13:21, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see said individual has arrived. I already noted that the census spells it Badgam, but this doesn't make it correct. I'm inclined to go with the official website's spelling: "Budgam". If anybody can provide other sources or an explanation of the discrepancy, I'd be delighted. Also, be aware that neither Budgam, Badgam, Budgam district, nor Badgam district are going to be deleted. Rutebega (talk) 21:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]