Jump to content

Talk:Balkh Province

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]

" The correct name of the capital is Mazar-e-Sharif. I just drove by the official welcome sign at the city gate yesterday." was posted on the main page, moved to here

Languages spoken

[edit]

If you dispute the data about the languages spoken, and their percentages, please provide citations to reliable published sources, do not just change the data. At the present (2 August 2009) the data on languages that appears in the article is properly cited to a provincial report of the government of Afghanistan, which is based on data from their Central Statistics Office and the UNFPA. Please see that report. --Bejnar (talk) 04:26, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The population of Balkh province was reported at 1,298,300 in the year 2014. Due to historical reasons, Balkh has the reputation as home to various ethnicity including Pashton, Uzbek, Hazara, Tajik, Aimaq, Balouch, Arab, and others. The main language used here are Persian and Pashto. http://www.southasiaathudson.org/afghanistan-provinces-1/2016/7/12/508eql49uc8p0bemlxn87n0lduh7a1

The major ethnic groups in the province are Tajiks and Pushtoons, while Uzbek, Hazaras, Turkomans and Sadats are in minority. There is a breakdown of each distrcts as well. The major ethnic group in Balkh province is of Tajiks, comprising over half of the population and· majority of the population in districts Shulgareh, Dehdadi, Nahre Shahi, Chemtal and Dawlatabad. The other significant ethnic group is of Pushtuns who are scattered throughout the province, but concentrated in the districts of Mazar, Balkh, Kholm and Char Bulaq. Significant numbers of Uzbeks are living in Dawlatabad, Shur Tapeh, Char Bulaq, Kholm and Kaldar. Turkmans make the majority in Kaldar and Shur Tappeh, and have a significant presence in Dawlatabad and Char Bulaq. Hazaras mainly live in' Mazar, Marmol and Chemtal. UNHCR Survey: http://www.afghandata.org:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/azu/3518/azu_acku_pamphlet_hc418_s35_a34_1992_w.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y 182.180.61.170 (talk) 07:51, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edits by 94.219.198.90

[edit]

Reverted edits made by IP 94.219.198.90. Pashto is spoken by around 27% of the population. That makes it a "Main Language" of the province. The IP removes Pashto from the list, but leaves Uzbaki language which is only spoken by 10% of the population. That is nothing but vandalism. (Ketabtoon (talk) 01:45, 11 August 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Ketabtoon, the IP didn´t removed Pashtu. Stop lying, Aughan. Just take a look on the views. However, in Balkh, the Pashtuns do not speak Pashtu. The main languages became Persian and Uzbaki, except in some remote regions. In Uzbek regions they speak Uzbak, like in Sohroobi and are mixed there with the population paternal.--188.107.8.82 (talk) 08:26, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Check the article before you revert it. It is not upto you to decide whether they speak Pashto or not. Do not delete sourced material. (Ketabtoon (talk) 13:59, 11 August 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Now you try to fool again everyone. The question is not if there are Pashtu-speaker in the province, it´s about the languages are spoken. And Pashtuns do not speak there Pashtu. The government have forbidden them. Not only that, they are a small minority immigrants from the sulaiman mountains who have to accept the rules of Tajik Noor Atta. They live in the country of Rumi, Saman Khuda and thousand others. If not, it´s easy for fascists like Noor Atta to deal with them to decrease their population to zero. Pashtu means in Balkh beeing a Taliban or a member of Haqqania network, a terrorist movement of Pushtuns, and member of Al-Qaida--188.107.8.82 (talk) 14:37, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop spreading lies. Pashtuns in Balkh DO speak Pashto since they have their own districts, Tajiks like yourselves are immigrants from Tajikistan when the Russian Red Army invaded your land your family escaped down to the north with along with many other Tajiks and Uzbeks. Next time, don't remove sourced material or you will be reported khar.Akmal94 (talk) 18:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Balkh Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Balkh Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:07, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Balkh Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:56, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Absolute nonsense in the chart heading of the districts mentioning the ethnic make up. Balkh district and Charbolak are not Tajik majority areas but mainly Pashtun. There are sources for this which i will show but in the mean time i am changing the number because its wrong and unsourced. Akmal94 (talk) 18:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Notes" column under section 7 "Demographics" needs to be removed?

[edit]

Unless I am mistaken (and please correct me if I am), there is no source(s) listed for the data that is in the "notes" column. With many of the districs having 100% of one of the ethnic groups, it leads me to believe that this is entirely made up. This column will be removed entirely until a source(s) is provided. Thoughts?

Districts of Balkh Province
District Capital Population Area[1] Notes
Balkh 97,055 100 % Pashtun
Charbolak 69,975 95% Pashtun , 5% others
Charkint 32,306 80% Tajik,10% Uzbek & 10% Hazara (Kawshi)
Chimtal 81,311 90% Pashtun,10% others
Dawlatabad 79,638 60% Turkmen and 40% Tajik
Dihdadi 66,009 100% Tajik
Kaldar 17,932 100% Turkmen
Khulm 49,207 100% Tajik
Kishindih 49,083 100% Tajik
Marmul 9,510 100% Tajik
Mazar-e Sharif 693,000 Tajik 45%, Hazara 45%, Turkmen 5%, and Uzbek 5%.
Nahri Shahi 38,791 100% Tajik
Sholgara 120,600 100% Tajik
Shortepa 30,314 100% Tajik
Zari 42,367 Created in 2005 within Kishindih District 50% Uzbek , 20% Baloch and 10%Tajik, Hazara and 10% Turkmen

WikiEditUsername7 (talk) 14:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is an archived page for one district (Shortepa) that indeed contradicts what the table says [1], indicating that where it says 100% Tajik is probably false. I do think that where it is 100% Tajik should be removed and it makes sense to get rid of the rest as well. Note: it originated in this edit and around this revision. Danre98(talk^contribs) 00:00, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References