Talk:Bambi (The Young Ones)

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

The Bambi Proof?

WTF?!

That's all I gotta say on the matter.--RevWaldo 00:49, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. It's bad enough it's on the page, but who actually sat and worked it out, and why?! I really think this should be removed. If no-one objects in a week it's gone. Spugmeister 12:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a week and no objection, I'm removing 'The Bambi Proof'. Spugmeister 22:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit late but I STRONGLY object to it being removed. it's good to know these things as it keeps track of the episode time relations, if I can get it back I will do so. MJN SEIFER 18:44, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And Now it's back up. I dunno why you guys deleted it but I thought it was unfair to the person who did it and as I mentioned it was informative and deleting it could be seen as vandalism. MJN SEIFER 18:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. It's not informative, it's bizarre. There's no need to keep track of time relations, it's a comedy not a documentary. It's there for comedic effect not continuity. I'm not getting into a revert war, but seriously, is the fact that someone went to the effort to work it out justification enough to keep this highly irrelevant speel cluttering up the page? It's an encyclopedia, do you think anyone will come to this page and think, 'Oh, I wonder if the air date coincides with the last time they washed their clothes?' Spugmeister 12:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I actually was wondering it. I was actually going Forum the question and I happend to look on here and it was there MJN SEIFER 19:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even so, Wikipedia is not a place to dump any old trivia. Spugmeister 09:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oxbridge

How come no one notcide that * Oxbridge is also a Portmanteau of real life coleges "Oxford" and "Cambridge" MJN SEIFER 19:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Granada Television Parody!

Here's something to add to the Trivia page. There is a sign behind Mel Smith as the security guard at the TV studio. If you look closely behind him, the sign reads GRENADA, not GRANADA! They even have the logo turned backwards! Curvebill 22:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Rutherford

Kudos to UCL Rutherford on "Christmas University Challenge" on 20 December 2015 for identifying the narrator of a recording of "Peter And The Wolf" as Toxteth O'Grady. Sadly it was incorrect. Mr Larrington (talk) 20:20, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bambi (The Young Ones). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070309155934/http://www.fortunecity.com/lavendar/hawkslane/231/yo21.html to http://www.fortunecity.com/lavendar/hawkslane/231/yo21.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]