Talk:Bank of America Tower (Manhattan)/Archive 1

Archive 1

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 05:21, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

images

Could anyone uplaod a newer image of the tower? Jerchel (talk) 19:39, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Naming

Shouldn't the article in some way reflect the other popular name for the building, One Bryant Park? Danlurie 02:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

concrete mix

"The construction of the Bank Of America tower was done by using concrete manufactured with the byproduct of blast furnaces. The mixture used in the tower concrete are 55% cement and 45% blast furnace slag. In fact the mixture of cement and slag cement makes the concrete stronger. Use of byproduct slag cement also causes less damage to the planet by reducing the carbon dioxide produced by normal cement manufacturing, where each ton of cement produced yields a ton of CO2 into the atmosphere."

Im curious why this is notable. Slag Concrete and Flyash Concrete are incredibly common. Hell, my research in concrete optimization for roads uses those two products. I also dont like the mixture being 55 percent cement and 45 percent slag. What this means is that we have a 100 percent paste concrete. No aggragrate???? thats amazingly expensive. also those statistics are meaningless if you dont know the water cement ration. I also dont like the statement of:

"where each ton of cement produced yields a ton of CO2 into the atmosphere."

Is this during the manufacturing of cement?? or during setting? Because if its during setting it makes no sense strickly on a mass balance scale. and if its during manufacturing is your stat taking into account the CO2 released during steel manufacturing(which is where a large portion of slag comes from)?

Barcode 13:09, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

I added "citation needed" to this and several other questionable statements. If reliable sources are not provided soon, these statements should be removed per Wikipedia's verifiability policy.
--JKeene 23:58, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Second Tallest?

The lead asserts that it's officially the second tallest building, while the section on height asserts that it's debatable--and that an official ruling hasn't been issued. Does anyone know the story on this? Nareek (talk) 11:28, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Mix-and Match of Completion

This artivle contradicts itself. In the Infobox it says it is complete, but the introductory paragraph says it is under construction. It is really under construction, and does anyone else spot any other points that it says it is built? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sneaky Oviraptor18 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 6 May 2009 (UTC)