Talk:Barbara Ann Wilcox
![]() | A fact from Barbara Ann Wilcox appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 May 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article should adhere to the gender identity guideline because it contains material about one or more trans women. Precedence should be given to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, anywhere in article space, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. Some people go by singular they pronouns, which are acceptable for use in articles. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Former, pre-transition names may only be included if the person was notable while using the name; outside of the main biographical article, such names should only appear once, in a footnote or parentheses.If material violating this guideline is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other related issues, please report the issue to the LGBT WikiProject, or, in the case of living people, to the BLP noticeboard. |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 16:35, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- ...
that transgender woman Barbara Ann Wilcox (pictured) successfully petitioned a California court to recognize her chosen name in 1941?Source: Slate- ALT1: ... that transgender pioneer Barbara Ann Wilcox (pictured) proposed to her husband the day she met him? Source: Slate
Created by Sdkb (talk). Self-nominated at 09:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC).
- Reviewing Mujinga (talk) 17:05, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- n
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: - Not done
Overall: What a great hook ALT1 is, I love it. Just a few small issues: "She died on September 9, 1962." needs a cite. ALT0 is not currently mentioned directly in the text, so that would need fixing or we can roll with ALT1. Also QPQ needs doing. Mujinga (talk) 17:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Mujinga: I've now done QPQ at Who Cares? (ballet). Death date citation is added, and text tweaked. Do you think ALT1 is the stronger hook? {{u|Sdkb}} talk 19:13, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
- Sdkb Cool QPQ is done, death is cited. I definitely think ALT1 is more hooky, so we can proceed by either 1/ striking ALT0 or 2/ mentioning and citing ALT0 in the article, then I can approve both. Up to you! Mujinga (talk) 11:00, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Mujinga: Let's go with ALT1, then! {{u|Sdkb}} talk 16:00, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
cool, striking ALT0 and approving ALT1, image is relevant and appropriately licensed. Mujinga (talk) 21:26, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Mujinga: Let's go with ALT1, then! {{u|Sdkb}} talk 16:00, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Sdkb Cool QPQ is done, death is cited. I definitely think ALT1 is more hooky, so we can proceed by either 1/ striking ALT0 or 2/ mentioning and citing ALT0 in the article, then I can approve both. Up to you! Mujinga (talk) 11:00, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Notes from new page patrol review
[edit]Nice work! North8000 (talk) 18:52, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Why is her deadname relevant like why is her old name on the page 4 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.127.88.66 (talk) 10:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Probably because she became notable under that name. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:13, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
gender pronouns
[edit]Should the article refer to her as 'her' rather than 'he' in the article 42.2.120.167 (talk) 11:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Discospinster: Hey! might I presume this user should be "she" instead of "he"? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:59, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Propose to protect this article as pronouns are being edited/reverted at a high frequency. The legal basis for gender identity is, as a current status worldwide, not universal, and thus open for debate. Because this article refers to an American person, I do think "she" should be used, considering the legal jurisdiction. Shonen84 (talk) 12:03, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- And we have no interest in all of that. We have MOS:GENDERID. Will probably SP for a long time. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Nice, ok, wasn't aware of that, thanks! Shonen84 (talk) 12:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- My pleasure. It has been a learning experience for me as well. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:14, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Nice, ok, wasn't aware of that, thanks! Shonen84 (talk) 12:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- And we have no interest in all of that. We have MOS:GENDERID. Will probably SP for a long time. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Marriage?
[edit]The article states: "When Richards's marriage became public during her case, she told reporters she would have it annulled. . ." This is the first mention of an actual marriage in the article (only a proposal is mentioned previously, leaving it up in the air if the proposal was accepted and if a marriage actually took place). There needs to be something about getting married before referring to a marriage. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 17:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- C-Class Gender studies articles
- Low-importance Gender studies articles
- WikiProject Gender studies articles
- C-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- WikiProject California articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Massachusetts articles
- Unknown-importance Massachusetts articles
- WikiProject Massachusetts articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class LGBT articles
- C-Class WikiProject LGBT studies - person articles
- WikiProject LGBT studies - person articles
- WikiProject LGBT studies articles