Talk:Barberenachampsa
Appearance
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Barberenachampsa be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Nomen nudum
[edit]Dilkes and Arcucci (2012) as well as Langer et al. (2007) regard the name "Barberenachampsa" as a nomen nudum. Dilkes and Arcucci (2012) mentioned that name once: "P. nodosa has been placed in a new genus Barberenachampsa by Kischlat (2000), but the name is invalid because it was not formally introduced as a new taxon". Furthermore, any paper I know of, even Kischlat and Schultz (1999) treat P. nodosa as a species of Proterochampsa, so I think we should redirect "Barberenachampsa" page to Proterochampsa. If someone disagrees, please let me know... Rnnsh (talk) 15:58, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Redirect-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- Redirect-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- Wikipedia requested images of palaeontology
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
- Redirect-Class amphibian and reptile articles
- Low-importance amphibian and reptile articles
- Redirect-Class amphibian and reptile articles of Low-importance
- Amphibian and reptile articles needing images
- WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles articles
- Wikipedia requested images of reptiles