Talk:Battle of Hoover's Gap

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal Battle of Hoover's Gap is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from Battle of Hoover's Gap was copied or moved into Lightning Brigade (US Army of the Cumberland 1863) on 05:04, 05 April, 2020‎. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Campaign?

I don't understand why the Tullahoma Campaign page is only about the Battle of Hoover's Gap. Randy Golden (talk) 13:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Ensured that the article is: within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class. It would benefit from: expansion, sections (Prelude, The battle, Aftermath), and in-text citations. --Rosiestep (talk) 17:36, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hoover's Gap was the only actual battle during the campaign; all of the rest was maneuvering. Our normal practice is to have a separate campaign article that summarizes the actions in multiple battles, including a campaign map, if possible, but since this one has only one battle, we (I) did not bother. It is on my to-do list, but not at a very high priority. You are welcome to take a stab at it. Check out some of the other campaign articles, such as Gettysburg Campaign or Northern Virginia Campaign for examples. Hal Jespersen (talk) 16:45, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Hoover's Gap. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:10, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]