Talk:Battle of Shanghai (1861)

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Chinese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Odysseus1479, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 31 January 2011.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Previous copyedits:
/
	This article was copy edited by Chamal_N on 18 Sep. 2008.

Copy editing

Some unclear information and non-NPOV statements were removed. Chamal ^Talk ± 16:21, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One Chinese place-name still requires translation. References to dates in the Chinese calendar should either use native names for the months or be converted to Western (Gregorian) dates. —Odysseus1479 (talk) 03:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Horrible grammar

The text is VERY unlear to read, and has unsourced statements. Somebody fix these. It's bad when the only source on this battle is horribly written. I blame google translate. 143.51.137.65 (talk) 08:57, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some grammar edits, the overall set linking from Taiping Rebellion needs to be gradually edited so that it is readable for all but its an interesting set of articles that need patience.--Kieranian2001 (talk) 15:59, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did my best except for the last stage where I've given up -.- Still I wouldn't say this article isn't neutral as it is lacking substantial information. Good luck for the next one who's trying.--Kojozone (talk) 12:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great!

Maybe is the most greatest in Wikipedia...... (talk) 15:59, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]