Talk:Belonogaster juncea juncea

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Hymenoptera task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Fall 2014. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Washington University in St. Louis/Behavioral Ecology (Fall 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

General Feedback

I thought that your article was very well written and I especially commend you for the use of bullet points in some sections that made the information very accessible to readers. I went through your article and corrected several grammar and punctuation errors just to improve the flow and clarity. Additionally I linked certain key words so that your article will receive more traffic. Beyond those technical changes I have some suggestions about content that could be added. Under Distribution and Habitat including a distribution map would be helpful to provide better visualization. Similarly, a more thorough description of how nests are built and the number of occupants an average colony has would be nice. Under Description and Identification a subsection on sexual dimorphism between males and females would also be useful. Addition of a whole new section regarding Human importance would also make this article more accessible for readers. This section could address their stings, aggression towards humans, effect on agriculture, etc. Overall I thought this was a great article and I hope my suggestions were helpful!

Akinjenn (talk) 01:58, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

First of all, I'd like to start by congratulating you, this was a great article and incredibly informative! I found the organization of the article to be impeccable, the depth to which you went to in certain sections (especially Behavior) was commendable as well. That said, I would definitely say that certain sections of your article could be expanded to keep up with the standards that you already set in your Colony Cycle and Behavior sections. The one that stood at the most to me was the subsection, Diet underneath Interaction with Other Species. Though succinct, I added a little more information on the actual process of food extraction. I found a good article that touches upon it that you might want to look it: Dejean, A., and Turillazzi, 1992. S., Territoriality during trophobioses between wasps and homopterans. Tropical Zoology. 5(2): 237-247.

Other than that, my only other issue was your definition of eusociality. Though eusociality can have indistinguishable castes, there are many cases of eusocial wasps that have clear dimorphism between workers and queens so I changed the absolutist tone of that part and to display something along the lines of "eusocial wasps have displayed, in many cases, no dimorphism between castes."

Spencer Tong (talk) 09:16, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Belonogaster juncea juncea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141111233546/http://www.waspweb.org/Vespoidea/Vespidae/Polistinae/Belonogaster/Belonogaster_juncea.htm to http://www.waspweb.org/Vespoidea/Vespidae/Polistinae/Belonogaster/Belonogaster_juncea.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]