Jump to content

Talk:Benefitive treasury measure

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I’ve made a series of modifications to the article.

A lot of it is the usual, mundane stuff – introduction amended (key name emboldened, etc) as per WP:AT, sentence structure amended for greater coherence, and general grammar corrections - WP:UPE. In essence, I’ve started to address the problems typical of new articles.

More importantly, I've added some references. That said, I’m not a one-man-army; if anyone else can help, please do; append references without delay.

RyanTheHeretic (talk) 13:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this term was used in one of my seminars today. Perhaps you go to my university Ryan!! I had no idea what it meant, so thanks for this explanation. HOWEVER this article needs to be rewritten. It doesn't flow properly and seems to jump from topic to topic. It makes sense in the end but it really needs to feel more interconnected. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.33.3.211 (talk) 18:11, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Benefitive treasury measure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]