Jump to content

Talk:Bennett's tree-kangaroo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2006 comments

[edit]

I have used the status classification of "secure" rather than the earlier "near threatened" status recorded for this species by the IUCN. This is based on the opinions of both by Roger Martin and Lewis Roberts, two of the world's top experts on this species. Since Aboriginal people have stopped hunting them, and the major part of the range of this Tree-kangaroo is now protected under World Heritage legislation, the numbers seem to be increasing and they are expanding their range. For example, a dead specimen was found just recently along Amos Bay Road, just south of Cooktown. John Hill 01:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is standard to use IUCN for all WP:TOL articles. You can add Martin's updated information into the text of the article, but leave the taxobox with the official status until that gets changed. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No worries! I reverted the taxobox to how it was before I changed it some time ago. Do please have a look at what I have written about the conservation status and let me know if you still have any qualms. Best wishes, John Hill 01:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed

[edit]

I have just added a Footnotes section and rearranged the references. We still need page numbers for a couple of the references and also someone to add the range area on the map - unfortunately, I am not in a position to do either. Can anyone help, please? Season's greetings, John Hill (talk) 22:22, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bennett's tree-kangaroo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:08, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]