Talk:Billboard Japan Hot 100
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Billboard Japan Hot 100 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Page now out of date
[edit]See: [1] (digital downloads counts since December 2010, and since December 2013 even tweets and Gracenote database look ups (or whatever) counts in the calculation of chart positions!) Sillent DX (talk) 18:15, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Billboard Japan Hot 100. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711152503/http://www.hcl-c.com/topics/20080228.pdf to http://www.hcl-c.com/topics/20080228.pdf
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5r8hqAO2a?url=http://www.billboard-japan.com/system/jp_charts/hot100/page%3A46 to http://www.billboard-japan.com/system/jp_charts/hot100/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:33, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
30 songs of most weeks on the chart instead of 109+ weeks qualifying in the future.
[edit]Hello everyone it has been apparent as the creator of this list on this page. I greatly appreciate all the effort you guys have put into this list. Since the charts as of the past few years have been extremely stagnant due to streaming and the lack of rules on this chart specifically songs that go recurrent. I think what's gonna happen in the next 6 months is that there's going to be a ton of songs that have either reached or passed that 109 weeks run on the chart. I think 30 songs will be enough. Maybe as a suggestion, we can make a separate list where songs that were in the top 30 rankings that have fallen off the chart will be considered a dropout of some sort.
Romaji vs Translation
[edit]Hi to those who also edit this page! I just wanted to ask, is there a specific policy on whether to use the transliteration or the translation of a song's name? Personally I've observed and tried to adhere to using romaji with kanji-titled songs and transliterations (which usually end up being translations) with romaji-titled songs. However, I've recently noticed some exceptions to what has been a pretty consistent rule - specifically with "New Genesis" or "Shin Jidai" by Ado and "Mahou no Juutan" or "Magic Carpet" by Takaya Kawasaki. Should these be changed to match the pattern I've noticed or is it fine to leave them as they are? Lightningmatt (talk) 05:18, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Lightningmatt: This is a WP:MJ issue that effects most media. Basically, every title should be the publicised English name of a work (i.e. don't use Sen to Chihiro no Kamikakushi, use Spirited Away), ideally a name consistently used by the official company/author(s) and by media outlets. If there's no consistent name (or it's not a release discussed in English-media press), then a transliterated title gets used. --Prosperosity (talk) 20:57, 8 February 2023 (UTC)