Talk:Blood-C: The Last Dark
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blood-C: The Last Dark article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Blood-C: The Last Dark has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 20, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Blood-C: The Last Dark/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contribs) 08:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Again, there's the problem of capitalizing "mangaka" as "Mangaka", but this doesn't affect the overall quality of the article; it's up to you if you want to change the capitalization or not. Nana Mizuki again should be wikilinked on the first mention in the Production section.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Despite the minor issues raised above, this article had far less issues coming into GAN than the original series' article. There is adequate information on the film's Japanese release, in addition to releases in other countries. Overall, the article gives a comprehensive overview of the film, given the sources. This is an easy pass. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- GA-Class anime and manga articles
- Low-importance anime and manga articles
- All WikiProject Anime and manga pages
- GA-Class horror articles
- Low-importance horror articles
- WikiProject Horror articles
- GA-Class film articles
- GA-Class Japanese cinema articles
- Japanese cinema task force articles
- GA-Class Animated films articles
- Unknown-importance Animated films articles
- Animated films work group articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- GA-Class Women artists articles
- WikiProject Women artists articles