Talk:Bloody GIR

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Television

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles

Woah, Anyone else creeped out by that?

 - Yes. quite.24.116.120.82 19:11, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A better question would be, who ISN'T creeped out by it? RememberMe? 01:33, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A new bloody gir has been confirmed (in Tak, the Hideous New Girl) I will post a picture soon (once I get the Season 3 DVD and can get a decent screenshot)

Could someone find a webpage showing different apperances of bloody gir? I searched on You tube, but I think they are mostly screamers. Tojo940 04:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you get some other screenshots, too? RememberMe? 01:33, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've found another bloody gir, I will post them up either today or tommarow (I got the Season 3 DVD. I'll take a screenshot on my PC.

Season 3? Do you mean volume 3? 68.103.180.158 23:42, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great if you could get screenshots for all five and put them in a gallery. That would really improve the article. RememberMe? 01:33, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

Should this be merged with the main Gir article? Almost all the information is there already.

I agree, we should merge--SUIT 05:13, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where is he?

Where is the Bloody GIR in this image?

211.28.152.140 07:30, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I contrasted the pic and circled Gir for you; it's really difficult to see him in the normal screenshot. It's usually best to just look for the big red eyes, as they show up the best.

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f391/Ahavaicons/Random/Bloodygirbbrp.png - Indy Gold 05:26, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shots from Plague of Babies

Hi; I have a few screenshots from Plague of Babies that I think are the ones that show Bloody Gir, but I'm not certain. I thought I'd link in case they did, and you're free to upload them to wikicommons or whatever to use for this page if you want them.

Set 1

Set 2

I don't know, I heavily modified it and all I see is a red eye. That could be one,but I'm not so sure. --AAA! 11:32, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah; a red eye and maybe a second red eye are all I see too. This was the only place in the part where he's supposed to be that I saw anything, though. Indy Gold 02:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OH! There it is... that's definitely a Bloody GIR! However, it's kind of hard to see normally... You should add the contrasted photo without the red circle. Or you could just put two of them: the normal and the contrasted photo with the red circle. It would be a pretty good addition to the article. GABO.

Merge

I say we merge it into the GIR article.--S U I T ^Halloween? 03:51, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I Say Don't. Bloody GIR is NOT GIR. They are two COMPLETLY Different Deities. Or in other words Bloody GOIR isn't a character while GIR is. That's why the articles should stay seperate.

Won123 Posted at 5:51 PM.

It's two differant things, one is a character, one is an easter egg. One has a presonality, and one has a list of possible sightings. They are not compatable. Devilmaycare 16:52, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is unecessary information that is already mentioned in the main article. Since when do easter eggs need their own articles?--SUIT 04:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Won. Don't merge. --AAA! ^(AAAA) 11:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If anything, it should be merged into the main Invader Zim article, but since that would clutter up the article I think it's fine as is. Tozoku 03:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. Not notable on its own. tgies 11:05, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, please.

And, yeah, it's creepy. Love GIR, though. THINMAN 06:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]