Talk:Blue Fire

Amusement Parks: Roller Coasters Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Roller Coasters task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Capitalization

Hi, I don't know what wikipedia has for rules, but blue fire is officially written without capital letters. See for instance the Euroapark website or the coasters own website: http://www.bluefire-megacoaster.com/ (news section). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.241.178.61 (talk) 11:06, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Even though blue fire may be the official name, Wikipedia advises against this (see MOS:TM/MOS:CAPS). There is also a technical reason why articles cannot start with a lower case letter. Themeparkgc Talk 22:28, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Height restrictrions

I just edited the height restrictions section because someone, who obviously didn't understand the idea of significant figures, converted "1.30m" as "51.181 inches". Which is nonsensical; this is a coaster height restriction we're talking about, not an engineering project where thousandths of an inch matter. If the restriction were literally 51.181 inches, the difference between a pass and a fail could be whether the child's footwear are new or a couple of months old. — 188.30.145.24 (talk) 20:40, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blue Fire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:45, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]