Talk:Bohemians 1905
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bohemians 1905 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
No friendship with St. Pauli anymore?
[edit]The banner of the friendship between Bohemians and St. Pauli (Barflies) can often be seen at home matches, where it is the banner in the middle... So i don't know if you can say that they "had" a friendship. --Luisao200 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16:49, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Fcbohem.JPG
[edit]Image:Fcbohem.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:FC Bohemians 1905 Praha.svg
[edit]Image:FC Bohemians 1905 Praha.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 03:06, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Bohemians versus Bohemians?
[edit]Can somebody with a bit of insight in Czech football please explain in the article the "Bohemians dilemma" (Bohemians 1905 versus Bohemians Praha (Střížkov)) of having two clubs with the same name? EA210269 (talk) 00:43, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Reply on Bohemians vs. Bohemians (Strizkov) dilemma
[edit]The story is very simple.
Bohemians Prague bankrupted in 2005 with quit high debts. There were two subjects that wanted to continue in famous history of this club from heart of Prague 10 - Vrsovice.
First of all there were fans that wanted to re-establish the club that they loved and supported it during all hard times in 100 year of the club history.
Second subject (strizkov) wanted absolutely the same and was willing to move to Bohemians Prague stadium Dolicek and "probably" pay all the debts and continue in professional football.
1) Czech Football association has confirmed that organization supported by fans that collected necessary amount of the money between themselves to clear debts in order Bohemians football club can return to professional football is the follower of former Bohemians club that bankrupted in 2005. The name of the club changed to BOHEMIANS 1905
2) Second subject (Strizkov) has rented a logo of Bohemians Prague (Kangaroo) from TJ Bohemians who was the owner of the logo for 1 year and renamed FC STRIZKOV to Bohemians Prague. This subject has never been recognized by football association as follower of bankrupted club, but football association has confirmed that FC Strizkov under name Bohemians Prague can enter to the league. Even if the "rent" of the logo should finish by end of 2007 Strizkov is still using it and of course this really bothers real supporters of Bohemians. Of course Srizkov is trying to make a profit from the players that have been officially reassigned from bankrupted club and therefore there is a lots of discussion ongoing at the court at the moment.
There is only one real Bohemians club. This club is playing at Dolicek and is nearly for all games sold out. On the other side Strizkov that is playing at Viktoria Zizkov stadium is currently having only few supporters.
I am not willing to blame anyone here, but for all real Bohemians fans there is only one real Bohemians and this is a club called BOHEMIANS 1905 playing at Dolicek those days and hopefully forever.
I hope those information bring little bit of light into this case. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.112.198.127 (talk) 20:00, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bohemians 1905. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131031175056/http://www.rsssf.com/tablest/tsje06.html to http://www.rsssf.com/tablest/tsje06.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Ipswich Town matches
[edit]Hi, the home and away scores versus Ipswich Town do not equal the aggregate score listed in your table. I suggest that this mistake should be fixed. 2A00:23C8:9C37:6C01:B42C:7407:BC5A:106D (talk) 19:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)