Jump to content

Talk:Bourke v. Beshear

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposal: Make the Title of this page Love v. Beshear

[edit]

Isn't it nicer? Wouldn't it flow better, and add humour to the "Love Wins" phrase (That parts just a joke). I can certainly see why this wouldn't be allowed under wikipedia's guidelines, but I've come to know the Love v. Beshear as the more famous of the two (but that's just subjective). Either way, I kind of just want to see a bit of discussion on this. Goldguy81 (talk) 22:43, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bourke v. Beshear. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:29, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]