Talk:Bride of Re-Animator

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

References to other Media

I noticed a line near the end in which Dr. Cain looks at the crypt wall and says "sounds like Rats In The Walls". Rats In The Walls is a short story by Lovecraft and I believe this was a reference, could it be incorporated into the article?--75.117.227.160 (talk) 04:51, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bride of re-amimator dvd cover.jpg

Image:Bride of re-amimator dvd cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bride of re-animator dvd screenshot.png

Image:Bride of re-animator dvd screenshot.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Premiere year: 1989 or 1990?

Should this article say that Bride of Re-Animator premiered/was released in 1989 or 1990? —Matthew - (talk) 21:09, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: As I type this, the first sentence in the article for Bride of Re-Animator describes it as a 1990 film, and the page's infobox lists a more specific premiere date of September 8, 1990 at TIFF. However, there are multiple sources which refer to the film as having premiered or been released in 1989, including the following:

There are also sources which point to the film as having premiered or been released in 1990, though:

Thoughts? —Matthew - (talk) 21:11, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It should be 1990. I saw this discussion in recent changes and wanted to investigate why 1989 is a possibility. IMDb here indicated it was the Sitges Film Festival in October 1989. Since this is not a reliable source but a useful clue, I sought a reliable source. It turns out that this says the film was an official selection (under PEL·LÍCULES) in 1990. If Sitges was the basis for 1989, and it is wrong, then there is no other reason why it would be 1989. I will contact IMDb to make this correction. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 21:29, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It may also have to do with the fact that the end credits for Bride of Re-Animator include the notice "© 1989 Re-Animator II Productions, Inc." I'm not sure which of the sources I mentioned based their information on that, on IMDb, or on something else. The copyright notice certainly indicates that the film was copyrighted in 1989, but I'm not sure if the film was also released that year. I think I'm going to look into purchasing some old Fangoria or Cinefantastique magazines from around that time to see if there's any relevant information there. —Matthew - (talk) 17:11, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that the film was released at the start of 1990, it was very likely completed in 1989 and got the copyright then. FYI, the IMDb page now says 1990 for the earliest release year, having corrected the Sitges screening from 1989 to 1990. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 21:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]