Talk:Bristol Parkway railway station/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bhtpbank (talk · contribs) 09:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bhtpbank - My initial thought is that it will not pass the "Stable" criteria. Reason: It has been heavily edited by one editor over the last month, and needs some time to elapse for other editors to read it and to ensure that there are no challengable issues. I would recommend that it be put up for GA review in a few weeks time. --Bhtpbank (talk) 09:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bhtpbank, I happened to see this as I was still watching your talk page, so I hope you don't mind my chiming in here. The stability criterion only requires that "it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute". There were two reverts in mid-October, but that doesn't seem to me to constitute "an ongoing edit war" that changes the article "significantly from day to day"; I'd say this is therefore fine on the stability criterion. Thanks Mattbuck for your work to expand this article, and Bhtpbank for agreeing to review! -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:54, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: recent attempts to query Bhtpbank have elicited the information that this was not meant to be an actual review but just to express an opinion, despite the near certainty that the review page was created by clicking on "create review" on the GAN page. As such, I am closing this review immediately, and resetting the article's talk page GA nominee template so that when a legitimate review is started, it will be on a GA2 page. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:14, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]