Jump to content

Talk:Broadcasting and the foundation of the Premier League

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleBroadcasting and the foundation of the Premier League was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 20, 2016Good article nomineeListed
September 13, 2022Articles for deletionMerged
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 8, 2014.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Sir Alex Ferguson in 1992 called the Premier League's decision to move its live games on satellite television as "the most ludicrous and backward decision football has taken"?
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Broadcasting and the foundation of the Premier League/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 14:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I shall be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  14:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "a company formed by the merger of Rupert Murdoch's Sky Television and British Satellite Broadcasting" - did Murdoch own British Satellite Broadcasting? This sentence makes it sound like he owned both anyway
    "but their case was thrown out of the High Court" - link High Court of Justice
    "Arsenal, Aston Villa, Everton, Leeds United, Liverpool" - link Everton FC and Leeds United
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    No original research found.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I couldn't find any issues with this article when reading through it. It is comprehensive, well written and well sourced. Since it meets the criteria, I see no reason to put this on hold. Nice work JAGUAR  19:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Broadcasting and the foundation of the Premier League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge articles?

[edit]

Suggest merging with Foundation of the Premier League since the two things are inextricably linked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.26.149.105 (talk) 15:19, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Both topics are intertwined greatly. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 13:22, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A merge seems fine, but Foundation of the Premier League is the broader topic and so should be the target. I note the difference in rated article quality, but don't feel that that should determine the merge direction. Klbrain (talk) 11:07, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with both Klbrain's points. jnestorius(talk) 17:39, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 03:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]