Talk:Buglife
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Lack of objectivity
[edit]Although I'm totally in favour of what Buglife represents and achieves, I find this article far too biased and promotional to be acceptable for Wikipedia. Much is a straight lift from their website viz: "Today bugs are under threat as never before, so help us to secure a diverse and wildlife-rich planet . . ." Parkywiki (talk) 00:15, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
[edit]Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: various pages at http://www.buglife.org.uk/ and more e.g. here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:10, 18 August 2012 (UTC)