Talk:Bulls (rugby union)

For the article to be accurate, one must distinguish between the Blue Bulls and the Bulls.

The Vodacom Blue Bulls do NOT compete in Super 14. They are the representative team of the Blue Bulls Rugby Union, which governs the sport in Pretoria, two nearby Gauteng municipalities, and Limpopo Province. This team competes in South Africa's domestic competition, the Currie Cup. The "Blue Bulls" logo is that of the Currie Cup team.
The Bulls are the Super 14 side. While they draw most of their players from the Blue Bulls union, they also draw from the Falcons, the Currie Cup side representing the East Rand and other Gauteng municipalities to the south and east of Jo'burg.

Just explaining my latest revert. Dale Arnett 22:34, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Super 10 participation

Point taken, but didn't they also compete in the previous Super 10 competition? The competition started out as Super 6, then became Super 10 when SA came from isolation from 1993. As far as I know the (then) Blue Bulls participated in the Super 10 tournament as well, then as Transvaal, and in fact won the first Super 10. Then in 1994 the Sharks (then Natal) made it to the final, and in 1995 Transvaal again made it to the final. Am I incorrect in this? I don't want to add information again unless I understand the whole thing correctly? Are the teams that competed in the Super 10 the same as the teams that competed in the Super 12 and now Super 14? See this for example.

TMoose 10:00, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Replying to this (a mere 8 years later!) because it's creeping in again. The Super 10 was a competition that was played between then-amateur provincial teams. This article relates to the Bulls, a franchise created in 1997. If the Super 10 information must be added in, it should be on the Blue Bulls page. The Blue Bulls were formerly known as Northern Transvaal never and participated in the Super 10. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 16:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article title

The Bulls and other South African Super 14 teams are franchises, not club. The article's title should be changed. Should it be changed to Bulls (Super rugby franchise) like the New Zealand Super 14 teams or Bulls (rugby union) like Welsh side Ospreys?

Eastpaw 9.30, 10 July 2006 (UTC+8)

Fair use rationale for Image:BullsRugbyClubLogo.jpg

Image:BullsRugbyClubLogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I have added a fair use rationale. --Stormie (talk) 02:39, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Crusaders (rugby) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 06:30, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That talk page refers to moving the page to Bulls (rugby franchise) which I would agree with. The current name, Bulls (rugby union) only creates more confusion about what a union is vs what a franchise is. This page is about the franchise, and should have that in the name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.96.15.22 (talk) 09:40, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned on Talk:Crusaders (rugby), I think it would be better to move the page to "Bulls (Super Rugby franchise)" just in case some other competition starts up that also use franchises, which might have teams with the same name. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 10:42, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bulls (rugby union). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bulls (rugby union). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071004213515/http://www.bluebull.co.za/default.asp?cId=6119&des=content to http://www.bluebull.co.za/default.asp?cId=6119&des=content
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bluebullsrugby.com/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.super14.com/bulls/default.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Split article?

Would it make sense to split basically everything below "Statistics" into a new article with a title like List of Bulls (rugby union) records and statistics similar to List of Leicester Tigers records and statistics to keep the main page cleaner?Skeene88 (talk) 12:31, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]