Jump to content

Talk:Burnden Park disaster

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Burnden Park disaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:33, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sad event. But must the word "war" be included ?

[edit]

I'm just rising the question. Naturally is terminology like "post-war" , "between the wars" etc just a way of making "time stamps". But "after 1945" is an example, which avoids mention "war" as if wars are just like any other event. I understand it's not intentional , but I really think that unnecessary mentioning of the word "war" well could be replaced , even if this article also deals with a disaster. Boeing720 (talk) 19:26, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replying 3 years later, but: the war should be mentioned as it was arguably relevant to this disaster, not just an incidental historical detail. As the article explains, part of the reason the ground was unsafe is because it had been unused (and used for other purposes) during the war years, and hadn't been restored to full operation at the time of the match. Robofish (talk) 19:52, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Burnden Park disaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:46, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]