Talk:Business routes of Interstate 96/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 02:59, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- The sentence "East of downtown, the spur turned southeasterly past another commercial area to eastern terminus was at exit 77 south of the city." is malformed.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Should mention a brief history of the early route designations for each business route, as you do in Business routes of Interstate 69 in Michigan.
- You should mention how many lanes wide and divided or undivided for the Lansing and Howell business routes.
- Why is the Farmington route referred to as "Old Business Loop I-96 (Old BL I-96)" and the Detroit route referred to as "Old Business Spur I-96 (Old BS I-96)"? I assume it wasn't prefixed with "Old" when it existed. I think the "Old" mention should be removed as we do not bold it for any other former route unless its an official title.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Pictures of the business loops would be nice to have. Also, It may help to have a map in the infobox showing where all the business routes of I-96 are. However, the lack of neither will hold this article up.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
I will put the article on hold for some concerns to be addressed. Dough4872 03:15, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Dough4872: updates applied. The reason the two have "Old" in the name is that MDOT uses that in their names as unsigned highways. Imzadi 1979 → 04:32, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- I will now pass the article. Dough4872 04:40, 5 June 2015 (UTC)