Talk:COVID-19 drug repurposing research
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the COVID-19 drug repurposing research article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 14 days ![]() |
![]() | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | WikiProject COVID-19 consensus WikiProject COVID-19 aims to add to and build consensus for pages relating to COVID-19. They have so far discussed items listed below. Please discuss proposed improvements to them at the project talk page.
To ensure you are viewing the current list, you may wish to . |
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Treatments for COVID-19: Current consensus
A note on WP:MEDRS: Per this Wikipedia policy, we must rely on the highest quality secondary sources and the recommendations of professional organizations and government bodies when determining the scientific consensus about medical treatments.
- Ivermectin: The highest quality sources (1 2 3 4) suggest Ivermectin is not an effective treatment for COVID-19. In all likelihood, ivermectin does not reduce all-cause mortality (moderate certainty) or improve quality of life (high certainty) when used to treat COVID-19 in the outpatient setting (4). Recommendations from relevant organizations can be summarized as:
Evidence of efficacy for ivermectin is inconclusive. It should not be used outside of clinical trials.
(May 2021, June 2021, June 2021, July 2021, July 2021) (WHO, FDA, IDSA, ASHP, CDC, NIH) - Chloroquine & hydroxychloroquine: The highest quality sources (1 2 3 4) demonstrate that neither is effective for treating COVID-19. These analyses accounted for use both alone and in combination with azithromycin. Some data suggest their usage may worsen outcomes. Recommendations from relevant organizations can be summarized:
Neither hydroxychloroquine nor chloroquine should be used, either alone or in combination with azithromycin, in inpatient or outpatient settings.
(July 2020, Aug 2020, Sep 2020, May 2021) (WHO, FDA, IDSA, ASHP, NIH) - Ivmmeta.com, c19ivermectin.com, c19hcq.com, hcqmeta.com, trialsitenews.com, etc: These sites are not reliable. The authors are pseudonymous. The findings have not been subject to peer review. We must rely on expert opinion, which describes these sites as unreliable. From published criticisms (1 2 3 4 5), it is clear that these analyses violate basic methodological norms which are known to cause spurious or false conclusions. These analyses include studies which have very small sample sizes, widely different dosages of treatment, open-label designs, different incompatible outcome measures, poor-quality control groups, and ad-hoc un-published trials which themselves did not undergo peer-review. (Dec 2020, Jan 2021, Feb 2021)
Ivermectin and COVID-19
[edit]Ivermectin and COVID-19 "Ivermectin Does Not Reduce Risk of Covid Hospitalization, Large Study Finds".
"Effect of Early Treatment with Ivermectin among Patients with Covid-19". doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2115869. {{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires |journal=
(help)
2600:1000:B03F:2983:4FD:F300:B6A2:155 (talk) 22:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Relevance of Zinc
[edit]https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.756707/full
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037021000660
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/can-zinc-levels-predict-covid-19-severity
Drsruli (talk) 19:58, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Would need a reliable WP:MEDRS source. Alexbrn (talk) 05:02, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Vitamin C
[edit]Complete replacement of the contents and references because of newer references available. Same content change at Vitamin C, a Good Article. David notMD (talk) 17:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- B-Class COVID-19 articles
- High-importance COVID-19 articles
- WikiProject COVID-19 articles
- B-Class medicine articles
- Mid-importance medicine articles
- B-Class society and medicine articles
- Mid-importance society and medicine articles
- Society and medicine task force articles
- B-Class pulmonology articles
- Mid-importance pulmonology articles
- Pulmonology task force articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- B-Class pharmacology articles
- Mid-importance pharmacology articles
- WikiProject Pharmacology articles
- B-Class virus articles
- Mid-importance virus articles
- WikiProject Viruses articles
- B-Class Disaster management articles
- Mid-importance Disaster management articles
- B-Class International relations articles
- Mid-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles