Talk:Cable transport
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cable transport article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article was selected as the article for improvement on 9 July 2018 for a period of one week. |
Social effects section
[edit]The current social effects section is pretty problematic. The first paragraph looks like original research and reads more like an instruction manual than a dispassionate encyclopedia article. It doesn't address social effects at all. Would anyone object to removing this section? At the least it needs a ground-up rewrite from sources. Railfan23 (talk) 18:42, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Technology
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Technology
- C-Class vital articles in Technology
- C-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles
- C-Class Transport articles
- High-importance Transport articles
- WikiProject Transport articles
- C-Class rail transport articles
- Mid-importance rail transport articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Wikipedia former articles for improvement