Jump to content

Talk:California Pacific University

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(9/24/11 Edits)

[edit]

Again, the superfluous edits by vandals have been removed. As the principal author and maintainer of this page, I ask you to please discuss edits before you make them. Thank you! 17:55, 24 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.124.151.110 (talk)

(3/20/09 change/reversion)

[edit]

Please discuss edits BEFORE making them. Thanks.76.212.1.54 (talk) 00:17, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing references does not inspire confidence in the modifications made. Proofreader77 (talk) 00:26, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Discussions about state efforts to regulated unaccredited schools are not germane to an individual school. Moreover, such discussions have nothing specific to do with an encyclopedic entry about this school. They have been removed time and time again, yet they have been surreptiously added again. Please add them to an appropriate page. Thanks. 76.212.11.176 (talk) 19:29, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(6/10/09 change/reversion)

[edit]

Please refrain from adding off topic information on lists of unaccredited institutions. The discussion plainly indicates that California Pacific University is not accredited by a recognized accrediting body. Moreover, the University does not claim such accreditation to my knowledge. If there is something germane, that is not on the page currently, please discuss it here before vandalizing the entry. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.212.0.82 (talk) 16:29, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(8/29/09 change/reversion)

[edit]

Please stop vandalizing this entry. The information on the use of unaccredited degrees does not belong within this entry. That is a separate topic and should not be repeated on the pages of unaccredited schools. Discuss your changes here before making them. Thank you. 76.212.1.218 (talk) 04:25, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(09/10/2009 Change)

[edit]

Potential risks of earning an unaccredited degree should be addressed on the page of unaccredited schools. If not here, then, where else should it be addressed? Why addressing potential risks of earning unaccredited degrees in this page is redundant? I would appreciate your input. Mathewca (talk) 08:21, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed off topic discussions on unaccredited schools. Again, this material has been removed many times because is has nothing to do with this school. The school is clearly labeled as an unaccredited school, which is how all schools start. This school seems to remain unaccredited but state approved, which is the choice of the governing body of the school. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.246.60.7 (talkcontribs) 19:59, 7 August 2010
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on California Pacific University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:51, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]