Talk:California State Route 54

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the California State Route 54 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

California State Route 54 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 10, 2015	Good article nominee	Listed
February 2, 2018	WikiProject A-class review	Approved

Current status: Good article

U.S. Roads: State highways / California Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. state highways

Locations

California

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the selected article of the U.S. Roads Portal in February 2020.

Itliong Vera Cruz overpass

Should this article include information about the Itliong Vera-Cruz overpass?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:20, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I could be convinced otherwise, but I'm leaning towards no, as there's so many bridges that are named in California. --Rs chen 7754 21:39, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are there other named bridges over CA-54, that are also excluded?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised to find out that there are. But quite often the people the bridges are named after don't even have their own article, which comes awfully close to "Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information". --Rs chen 7754 18:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Larry Itliong (google book search)

Philip Vera Cruz {google book search)

--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Quite often"... but still, I'm not convinced this should be in the article. --Rs chen 7754 22:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If there are named overpasses/underpasses perhaps a collapsed list of that verified content could be added to the article. This would only add to the completeness of the article.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, indiscriminate information... in the overall context of the road, it is not significant. (And we don't generally do collapsed lists in articles). --Rs chen 7754 22:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Count myself as opposed to the above opinion. But whatever, apparently my opinion and the potential of expanding the article with reliable sourced content is not important.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]