Talk:Canadian Securities Institute

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Canada.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

DMS Derivatives Market Specialist was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 19 June 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Canadian Securities Institute. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg

Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We're not here to advertise

So please don't cram the page with TM, R, C or any other marks indicating proprietary information. I haven't been able to find any independent, reliable sources on this so far on Google News or books. They may be out there, but right now it's a lot of tangential mentions of people holding designations rather than discussion of the institute itself. Also, should it be moved? The page was a massive collection of WP:VANISPAM and I'd rather it did not return to that. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 14:34, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There was no advertisements

CSI is the official Canadian securities regulator's (IIROC, former IDA) official educator, and as such the wikipedia should provide the information about it. The external links serve to prove the validity of information. It is irrelevant if there are no discussions about it on google. The page does not contain spam, bragging, nor non-validated information. If one still thinks that there are, please let him/her pin point exactly to the parts of the page he/she thinks violate the wiki standards, instead of deleting the whole page and reversing it to the stub. In fact, deleting the whole page by the user WLU is likely to be considered as vandalism in wiki standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vlad wiki (talk • contribs) 03:26, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WLU's trim of the article was required by Wikipedia guidelines, as was my revert of the article today, because of the extensive use of copyrighted text from the CSI website in the article. —C.Fred (talk) 04:22, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Someone doesn't know what vandalism is. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 01:55, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Canadian Securities Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120507073655/http://opinion.financialpost.com/2010/06/04/financial-education-helps-stabilize-global-financial-system-csi-head-says/ to http://opinion.financialpost.com/2010/06/04/financial-education-helps-stabilize-global-financial-system-csi-head-says/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:38, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Chartered Investment Manager into Canadian Securities Institute

The description of the certificate itself is purely advertorial in tone. Seems sufficient to be added to the article on the Institute. — Kochas 14:52, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]