Talk:Cancer and nausea

Cancer and nausea was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 3, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Cancer and nausea.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Cancer and nausea received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

A fact from Cancer and nausea appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 October 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that cancer and nausea are associated in about fifty percent of people affected by a malignant neoplasm?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cancer and nausea.

Wikipedia

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources

As noted above, medical articles should be based on wp:MEDRS sources. These are, in short, recent, secondary, peer reviewed, and independent of the primary sources they cite. It presently cites Geiger et al, which is a primary source, and just a study protocol at that. Similarly, Lee et al is a primary study. Both should be replaced with secondary sources. LeadSongDog come howl! 03:43, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

done. Ochiwar (talk) 14:59, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: The Impact of Cancer

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2024 and 4 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MTFFTM (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Apolloh01.

— Assignment last updated by Dandelions-love-to-fly (talk) 19:23, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]