Talk:Canoe & Kayak UK

Canoe & Kayak UK received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Magazines Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Canoeing and Kayaking (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canoeing and Kayaking, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Canoeing and KayakingWikipedia:WikiProject Canoeing and KayakingTemplate:WikiProject Canoeing and KayakingCanoeing and Kayaking articles

Lincolnshire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Water sports

	Canoe & Kayak UK is within the scope of the WikiProject Water sports, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Water sports. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Water sportsWikipedia:WikiProject Water sportsTemplate:WikiProject Water sportsWater sports articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sourcing References

Hi all, just to say will try and find few different non-forum sources for some of the more subjective references. I think factual stuff like contributor lists etc, should be fine as they are though. Thanks! Cs1043 (talk) 08:02, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great work

The article has progressed very well, it seems to have adopted a more unbiased stance and comments heavily on the operations of the magazine. There is useful information here for fans of the magazine to gain more insight and find more content. Worthy of a wikipedia article.

Warshid (talk) 11:27, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dead?

It looks like the website stopped being updated back in 2014 and I assume the magazine is no longer being published? — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 18:29, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]