Talk:Central Coast & Newcastle Line

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks references.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

Australia: Sydney Low‑importance

	Australia portal Central Coast & Newcastle Line is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Corrections

The Short North does not go near Tuggerah Lakes, BUT does skirt Lake Macquarie near Teralba. The correct name is Brisbane Water. --Commissioner Geoff (talk) 02:27, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Other stopping patterns

In addition to the stopping patterns listed, there are some services which start at Newcastle and run all stops to Gosford and then terminate. Two of these trains arrive at Gosford at 5:37 PM and 6:16 PM on weekdays and there are some others as well.Eregli bob (talk) 11:13, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed New Stations

I've noticed people keep removing some of the information and links about the 2 proposed new stations because it hasn't been referenced correctly. The new stations are mentioned on their respective local council websites, and also in various state transport planning documents and reports dating back to 1998.

Glendale: http://www.lakemac.com.au/lake-macquarie-transport-interchange
North Warnervale: http://www.wyong.nsw.gov.au/for-business/warnervale-town-centre — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.170.255.237 (talk) 14:25, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One of the references provided here states that "Council will continue to work with Transport for NSW to monitor patronage and demand and consider the need for a train station at Glendale in the long term. No funding commitment has been made to Stage 2 of the project." So certainly not definite plans as stated in the article at the moment. I will have a further look at them later today. Fleet Lists (talk) 21:11, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Central Coast & Newcastle Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150109003151/http://www.transportnsw.info/en/transport-status/news/2014/newcastle.page to http://www.transportnsw.info/en/transport-status/news/2014/newcastle.page

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:51, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

naming convention

does this need a 'railway' and the Line to be line ? Central Coast & Newcastle railway line which already exists as a disam page, so why the non-conformity ? (just checking) Dave Rave (talk) 23:43, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a line, as in a branded service operating a regular, predictable pattern of operation. "xxx railway line" is for physical railway lines. The title is consistent with other NSW TrainLink and Sydney Trains lines, except for Carlingford railway line and Olympic Park railway line, where the physical lines and the services that run on them are so heavily intertwined it makes no sense to separate the two. Gareth (talk) 01:00, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ok, ta Dave Rave (talk)

Services section

Since this article is about the passenger service and NOT the physical line, I think that this article should NOT include information about freight trains and regional services. That should be in the Main North railway line, New South Wales article, not here. There's also a sentence which infers that ALL services on the line are hauled by diesel locos which is incorrect, but I think that that sentence should be removed altogether in order to fit within the article's scope. Fork99 (talk) 12:17, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]