Talk:Charles Napier (Royal Navy officer)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Military history: Biography / Maritime / British / European / Napoleonic era C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

Biography: Military / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Untitled

Should this not be moved to Charles Napier (admiral)? Brendandh 16:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't see the point. Obviously he wasn't an admiral all his career, and many of his exploits were performed before he attained that rank. The more general 'Naval officer' seems appropriate to me.Cenedi 21:30, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it normal in Bio articles to give a dead subject his more senior title? E.g. No King or Queen were Kings and Queens for all their careers either, yet are always referred to as such. This article should at least be entitled Sir Charles Napier, so by dissociating him from Charles James Napier, (also a Knight) his cousin and General officer in the army. Although I have done it myself in earlier articles, it seems that the use of information in parentheses in the title, should be reserved for the main article or info on a disambig page. Brendandh 00:34, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is unusual for the name of an article to include an honorific or title, such as "Sir", just as it would be unusual for the name of an article to include "King" or "Queen" - compare Henry VIII of England and Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom. Disambiguation of the various Charles Napiers by parenthesis is quite usual, in my experience, although I am agnostic about "(naval officer)" or "(admiral)".

What does the Manual of Style say? -- ALoan (Talk) 11:25, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't feel strongly about any of this: I'm just trying to think in terms of someone looking for further information who could have encountered Napier in any one of several contexts, including Napoleonic Wars, War of 1812, Syrian War etc - in none of which he was an Admiral, but the context would be naval. He was, in fact, "Charles John Napier", but the middle name is very seldom cited.Cenedi 17:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, ideally, we would have redirects, so Admiral Charles Napier and Captain Charles Napier would all come here too. I did not realise that he has a middle name: he should probably be at Charles John Napier, to distinguish him from General Charles James Napier. -- ALoan (Talk) 18:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Charles Napier (Royal Navy officer)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

With appropriate citations, could become a B-class artilce pretty easily. Coemgenus 15:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 15:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 11:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Charles Napier (Royal Navy officer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]