This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article was copy edited by Tdslk, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 25 August 2017.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
I strongly feel that this article is strongly biased in favor of this subject and that it is not objective, it tends to (a) reflect too much broad credit to the subject for many things that he might or might not have achieved and (b) the negative and controversial sides of his career have not been mentioned , or properly touched upon to give a proper sense that this article is being written as per Wikipedia's given guidelines . In my opinion, it largely needs to be scrutinized by some objective/neutral editors , and extensively re-edited and re-written as per requisite standards. I do not have any personal differences with anyone and there is no need to be defensive , I am simply trying my very level best to express my opinion and request that the article may be scrutinized accordingly, Thank you. 39.54.50.130 (talk) 19:37, 9 July 2017 (UTC) Col (retd) Mumtaz Malik, Pakistan[reply]
Mumtaz Malik, I've written most of this bio and I don't see it a biased in favor of anyone. You need to point out the specific issues and where exactly the article gives unnecessary "broad credit to the subject" so that it can be fixed. Concerning negative and controversial sides of his career, don't you see the last para under political career is bit negative? but other than that I couldn't found any such information via reliable sources so I wonder if you can share few links here? But please keep in mind we generally avoid adding criticism and controversies or similar in BLP's because they are poor writing style and may compromise the article's neutral point of view of the subject. If it remains unclear what the NPOV violation is, the tag that you added may be removed. For you information, recently I was able to bring Ishaq Dar upto Good article status and it is as neutral as this bio is therefore I believe it is balanced, and most important well-sourced article via high-quality, independent, reliable secondary sources, which adhere to Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Perhaps @Greenbörg: as an uninvolved editor can take a look at the page and give two cents? --Saqib (talk) 06:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Article is as neutral as it can be. Firstly, we don't add something which is unsourced so it should be sourced before adding. Secondly, I have read thoroughly and found nothing biased thing to either side. Greenbörg(talk)08:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]