Talk:Cheadle Hulme

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cheadle Hulme article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Cheadle Hulme is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 5, 2021.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 8, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
May 6, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed
June 3, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
June 27, 2009	Featured article candidate	Promoted
July 31, 2021	Featured article review	Demoted
Current status: Former featured article

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greater Manchester Low‑importance

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Education in England#Specialist qualifications|academic qualifications]] The anchor (#Specialist qualifications) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Featured article review needed

Pre-TFA note places of worship

Other extant places of worship:

Friends Meeting House, Station Road (registered 1956)
First Church of Christ, Scientist, Queens Road (registered 1958)
PBCC meeting room, Nursery Road (registered 1979)

Only refs available to me at the moment are their Worship Registration certificates. I can add if required, though. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 11:41, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Potential featured article review

I have no idea how this is a featured article. It contains multiple bad citations and old information that needs to be updated. Many citations have failed verification because they do not even have the content that is claimed in the article. I have seen some claims of "dead link"-s but it seems as if though most have been fixed. This issue has to be resolved because it is a TFA. Wretchskull (talk) 08:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hilarious

I drive Ladybridge Road every week. So imagine my laughter when I see that the image of a crack site under the railway viaduct is chosen to be the emblematical image of "millionaire's row" Cheadle Hulme.

Haha....what a classic! 81.141.59.125 (talk) 11:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Landmarks

The list of landmarks starts off with Bramall Hall which is located inside Bramhall Park and its location is described as being "located between Cheadle Hulme and Bramhall". This is not really accurate. Cheadle Hulme doesn't even border Bramhall Park and both the park as well as Bramall Hall itself is actually fully within Bramhall.^[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheEagleGuy (talk • contribs) 12:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://www.citypopulation.de/en/uk/northwestengland/wards/E08000007__stockport/

FAR notice

This FA is a 2009 promotion whose main writer stopped editing in 2013. It fails comprehensiveness, has dead links and citation formatting issues, and contains dated content. Unless these issues can be addressed in the coming weeks, the article will need to be submitted to Featured article review. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A broader discussion about TFA scheduling is at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article#Define "emergency". SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, noting that Bramall Hall is similarly old and written by the same now-departed editor, so should be reviewed per WP:URFA/2020. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Surprising choice

I was pleased but extremely surprised to see this finally on the main page after nearly 12 years. The article has deteriorated significantly and is incredibly out of date and inaccurate in many places. It’s a shame it took so long to be chosen as it was a lot better back when it became featured. Majorly talk 16:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see you, Majorly; an initiative to assess the status of older FAs is underway at WP:URFA/2020. If you have the time or interest to let us know how Bramall Hall looks, that would be most appreciated! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.citypopulation.de/en/uk/northwestengland/wards/E08000007__stockport/

[1]