This article was nominated for deletion on 10 September 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
Cheryl Cole's Night In received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
A fact from Cheryl Cole's Night In appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 December 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheryl, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CherylWikipedia:WikiProject CherylTemplate:WikiProject CherylCheryl articles
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because, as a new user of Wiki, I'd like to know if this page is suitable to become a good article (or would its brief nature affect this?) Also, what needs to be changed/improved?
Some copyediting by a third party might help a little. E.g. "The programme was hosted by Holly Willoughby, featured a host of other performers and acted as a lead-in to the final of the sixth series of The X Factor, in which Cole is a judge." Somewhat awkward sentence.
Since you asked about length, I'm not aware of a minimum size guideline for articles. My thinking in general is that you should either be able to say a lot about a topic or else perhaps the topic really isn't substantial enough to merit an article. I would encourage looking for more content although, as I say, there is no explicit requirement.
The source for the Setlist section is not explicitly specified. I have seen articles get away with that but I wouldn't give an article GA if a whole section were missing a citation.
I didn't see the show but if the interviews had significant content then it would be interesting to read about what was discussed.
The Reception section feels a little cobbled together. It is certainly good that you are citing specific reviewers. Still, though it is tricky to do in a neutral way, it would be good to also give a more overall impression of the reception rather than just listing opinions.
Be careful about using expressions like "Chezza" without explaining them. Granted it wouldn't be too hard for a reader to guess that this is a nickname for Cole but it is preferable to be more clear.
One thing that might get questioned in a GA review is the notability of the topic. What reason is there to think that this show will be remembered or regarded as especially unique years from now? To tell the truth, though, I think you there are a lot of editors that would support an article on a TV special regardless.
Be careful about expressions like "whilst". I don't know if WP has a specific policy but, for example, the Times style guide says to use "while" instead (see [1]).
It's probably hard to do but more images would be nice.
Take a peek at My Musical as an example of a GA article covering a TV episode.
I suggest you make the columns in the setlist table wider so that they don't cause the table to be so long. It is also possible to set them to be a percentage of the available screen width so that they auotomatically adjust to the most appropriate size.--DavidCane (talk) 17:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In this article she should be referred to as Cheryl Cole rather than her mononym, because she was Cheryl Cole at the time it was recorded. Any thoughts? This is Paul (talk) 22:36, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
