Jump to content

Talk:Christopher-Lee Dos Santos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hi, for some reason one of the links that we have used as reference is blacklisted. This link is www.examiner.com/review/angel-of-the-skies-2013-movie-review-for-king-and-country

Can we get this fixed so that it can be updated on the reference list.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.237.16.5 (talk) 12:36, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, the Examiner is not considered a reliable source. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What is considered a reliable source then? How can a online review be not reliable? It's not like this film was made by Spielberg, it's an indie movie, so smaller publications will review it. I have found a few German and French reviews but their translation isn't great. Should I rather post those? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.237.211.252 (talk) 20:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If Der Spiegel or Le Monde reviewed it, then yes, please add that as a reference. Or anything similar. Even anything downmarket from there, as the Daily Express would still be acceptable if it gave a serious review of the movie, even though that paper is downmarket from, for example, The Times. (I don't know details of every respectable daily published in France and Germany, so this is to give a general idea, not an exhaustive list.)
Blogs and unproven non-expert sources are not reliable. That goes for Examiner, blogspot, and anything else similar. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:50, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thank you very much. I'll do some more searching. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.237.211.252 (talk) 11:17, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]