Jump to content

Talk:Chuck Versus the Intersect

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleChuck Versus the Intersect has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 19, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
August 16, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Guests vs. Recurring, etc.

[edit]

Ok, someone went through and made a BUNCH of changes to the guest cast list for several episodes, beginning with this one. The problem is I'm not sure I agree with some of these changes:

Julia Ling, Scott Krinsky, Ryan McPartlin and Vik Sahay certainly shouldn't be considered as "guest stars," as they were part of the recurring cast in season one and main cast of season 2. I also disagree with listing Tony Todd for any Season 1 episodes and 2x01, (his Cougars appearance probably counts as guest starring since by that time he had left the show) or Bonita Friedericy at all as they are part of the recurring cast. Some also list the characters played by guest stars, and some not.Ambaryer (talk) 00:37, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Music

[edit]

I updated the music section but, I am unsure of the best way to site the source. I wanted to only have one reference link but there was no obvious place to insert it that implied it was supporting the whole section. meitme (talk) 19:31, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Chuck Versus the Intersect/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 11:10, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


Eurgh, McG.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Prose is mostly fine. I'd maybe ditch things like "normal guy" as it's pretty informal. Try "man" or "person" instead. I'm also not quite sure what "Zachary Levi was the first cast, in the title role of Chuck" means. Was he the first person considered for the role?
Fixed.--Boycool (talk) 12:02, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I still don't know what you mean to say by "Zachary Levi was the first cast". Was he cast without other people being considered, or was he the first one to audition, or do you just mean he's the lead role? GRAPPLE X 12:27, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I mean that he was cast before any of the other cast members (Adam Baldwin, Yvonne Strahovski, Joshua Gomez, Sarah Lancaster). --Boycool (talk) 00:57, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fair do, I get what you mean now. I'll clarify that in the article and we're good to go then. GRAPPLE X 01:03, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  1. B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    MOS is fine.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    I'm not sure ref 21 is really a reliable source to use, as "ChuckTV.com" seems like it falls under WP:FANSITE. Since you're using it to cite something that's going to be attributed in the episode's credits, there should be something more reliable to use - the episode itself, at a push, or maybe a DVD booklet? Also, ref 27 is malformed, evidently something's been entered into the template incorrectly.
I fixed 27 and am looking for a suitable replacement to 21. If none can be found, should I remove that material altogether?--Boycool (talk) 12:02, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
{{Cite episode}} has a "credit" field for flexible use, just use that to credit the music, so long as it's mentioned in the episode's end credits. GRAPPLE X 12:27, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is not credited. --Boycool (talk) 00:57, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    The scope is fine, not too broad or narrow.
  2. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Article is neutral.
  3. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Article is stable.
  4. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Two commons images, no problem there. One non-free image File:Chuck Pilot.jpg needs a fair-use rationale, as simply calling it a screenshot of the episode does not speak to a valid reason for use. This definitely needs addressed.
  1. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    There's a few issues that need to be addressed with the article, but once those are sorted out it should have no trouble passing. I'm putting it on hold for now.

All sorted, then. Passing this one. GRAPPLE X 01:03, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! --Boycool (talk) 01:09, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chuck Versus the Intersect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:15, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chuck Versus the Intersect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:25, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chuck Versus the Intersect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:55, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chuck Versus the Intersect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:41, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]