Talk:Clementine cake/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 02:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A nice read. Will review. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 02:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could we link orange muscat, white dessert wine, Riesling wine and tangerine oil? I do not think we come across these terms as commonly as milk or butter.

Done as much as possible. dessert wine and Riesling are now linked. There are no articles for tangerine oil or orange muscat. The closest article for the latter is Muscat (grape), but this does not appear to be related. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do we have no inline citation to support the part "and vanilla extract"?

Done. Moved a citation, which mentions both almond and vanilla extracts. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some variations exist If this is a regional variation, then where is flour not used to make the cake? Would be an interesting addition.

From a source review, the variations are not regional in nature, they're simply variations on how the cake can be prepared. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:06, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

and can fall if it's In articles, I guess "it is" should look better.

Done. Rewrote to "it is". North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:55, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think an infobox would do great here (like the one at Cincinnati chili).

Done. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:01, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think "Preparation and variations" would be a better name for the "Overview" section.

Done. That works for me too. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:03, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The citations are well-formatted, and the sources highly reliable. Good job!

Thanks! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:04, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can we have more information on the origin, chemical composition or nutrition and the history of the cake? It is not necessary, but would do this article tremendous good. The Baker's Four Seasons: Baking by the Season, Harvest, and Occasion source claims that it is a rich source of Vitamin D, which would be a great addition.

I have added "It may provide significant amounts of Vitamin D" (and a source) to the lead. Nutritional information varies greatly among various cake varieties (e.g. see [1]), and many of the available sources are not reliable. As such, it seems best to include the minor addition to the lead, rather than have a nutritional information section that only contains this brief information.

Regarding the origins, composition, etc., not much more information is available. During the process of creating and expanding the article, I pretty much used up all of the reliable sources that are available online (e.g. from Google Books, Google News, Highbeam, etc.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:14, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I like the graphical presentation at Crab dip. The images in our article are a bit stacked above one another, so the gallery arrangement would certainly be better.

After addition of the infobox, I modified the image layout. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:04, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Northamerica1000, I believe we have no issue left. I shall be happy to promote this. Thanks once again for your rapid response! Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 03:49, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]