Talk:Cochliasanthus

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Central America

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Central America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Central America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Central AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Central AmericaCentral America articles

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was an agreement to merge Vigna caracalla into Cochliasanthus. Ninjatacoshell (talk) 15:32, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that Vigna caracalla be merged into Cochliasanthus because Cochliasanthus caracalla is the currently-accepted name [1].Ninjatacoshell (talk) 18:11, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support - For the above reason. Ninjatacoshell (talk) 18:11, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I am not a botanist, but this seems reasonable to me. Invertzoo (talk) 15:40, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cochliasanthus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140123190934/http://www.logees.com/ftg/Vigna.pdf to http://www.logees.com/ftg/Vigna.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:42, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two Articles in One?

It seems this article is about both Cochliasanthus caracalla and Phaseolus giganteus/Vigna speciosa, even though it claims to only be about the former. Doesn't the content on the latter deserve to be its own article? Ackqwattikk Phfisch (talk) 18:40, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree with this.

"Cochliasanthus caracalla" and "Phaseolus giganteus" are clearly different enough!

This page is super confusing to read. Symphanticade (talk) 20:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicting Information!

1. One section states: "The purple, non-fragrant, invasive flowers of the "Phaseolus giganteus" are..." 2. Another section states: "The snail vine, Phaseolus giganteus, is delightfully fragrant."

This needs to be fixed. Symphanticade (talk) 20:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]