Talk:Code of Vengeance/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: no disambiguations found

Link rot: no dead links found

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   I made a few copy-edits - mostly needed commas.[1]

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The article is adequately referenced to reliable sources, which support the cited statements.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Sufficient detail without trivia.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Three images used, with suitable tags and captions

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Well, I can't find anything wrong with this; I judge that it meets the GA criteria and will list it accordingly. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC)