Talk:Codex Chisianus 45

Straighten something up

So, does the Codex Chisianus 88 contain everything of the original version of the Book of Daniel? It sounds confusing to me. Komitsuki (talk) 15:11, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. I think the answer is “no” but this could be clarified in the article. — ℜob C. alias ALAROB 14:07, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

John Gwynn quote

Just did a rewrite that preserves the blockquote from John Gwynn, published in 1911. But I am critical of the maximalist rhetoric: “cannot… at all”, “in every possible way”, “so entirely”. This is typical of a certain kind of old-fashioned persuasive writing, which IMO <sarcasm type="imitative">could not possibly be more irresponsible.</sarcasm>

I wouldn’t object to deleting it. A more appropriate replacement would be even better. — ℜob C. alias ALAROB 15:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]