Talk:Cohiba (cigarette)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cohiba (cigarette). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051126042202/http://www.habanos.com/pcigarrillos.asp to http://www.habanos.com/pcigarrillos.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Brand Promotion| Violation of Notability Guidelines
[edit]The whole article reads like the user is promoting or upselling a cigar brand in Cuba. It has no strong citations to show if the brand has achieved global prominence. Neither does the article support any factual data that could be helpful for Wikipedia's knowledge bas. As per the violation of Wikipedia's notability guidelines, the draft should be deleted. Or at least, if the user can find reliable and factual data regarding the brand, it should stay in draft space unless it's ready for article space. Naomikrate (talk) 07:31, 27 October 2022 (UTC)