Talk:Computer Bismarck/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I am beginning a GA review of this article. Please feel free to leave any questions, comments and other reviews below. Thanks a bunch! -- Nomader (Talk) 04:13, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- I'm always wary of passing something just off the bat, but you've done a very good job with this article– I can find no reason not to pass it. The images need alt text, but it's not a requirement for the article to have it at this stage. I can't check the written sources either, but I'm assuming good faith with the understanding that they accurately reflect what's sourced in the article. Congrats, Guyinblack. -- Nomader (Talk) 07:01, 13 August 2009 (UTC)