Talk:Concepts (C++)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Concepts (C++) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from C++0x was copied or moved into Concepts (C++) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
some papers
[edit]There are some interesting-looking concept-related papers referenced here:
http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/cpl/record/index.xsql?pubid=76351
70.90.174.101 (talk) 07:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
This also looks interesting:
J. Bernardy, P. Jansson, M. Zalewski, S. Schupp, and A. Priesnitz. Generic programming with C++ concepts and Haskell type classes: A comparison. Journal of Functional Programming, 20(3-4): 271302, 2010.
67.122.211.84 (talk) 02:12, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Mention Concepts Lite?
[edit]In my opinion, the proposal "Concepts Lite"[1] (which will probably be released as a Technical Specification[2]) should be mentioned somewhere on this page. But I'm no expert in this topic so someone else should better add it at the appropriate location. New section? Or only refer to it at the bottom? Leemes (talk) 22:36, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
References
Current status
[edit]This article largely focuses on C++11. Perhaps someone knowledgeable could update it now that C++14 is out and C++1z is taking shape.
212.119.138.101 (talk) 17:24, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- updated to what we have now in post-Jacksonville 2016, hth. --Cubbi (talk) 20:55, 19 April 2016 (UTC)