Talk:Copyright Duration Directive

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

European Union Mid‑importance

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Is the mickey mouse protection act really controversial? I wish it was, but I'm not sure it qualifies. If everyone that is aware of the act is opposed to it, and the vast populace is completely unaware, does that count as controversial? Mathiastck 02:12, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

:P -- pde

Preparative Texts - Opinion of the EESC

I am not familiar with the numbering of the legal texts of the European Economic and Social Committee, that's why I didn't change anything yet. However the wiki box on the right states a document number "C287" as a preparative text of the EESC concerning this directive. When I searched the homepage of the EESC (http://eesc.europa.eu/documents/opinions/avis_en.asp?type=en) for this text, I only found opinion no. 813 of 01/07/1992 stating an opinion to this directive. Is anyone familiar with this, should I change it? . 84.114.147.101 00:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Implementation in Sweden

I think it was fully implemented in Sweden on January 1, 1996. But I haven't been able to verify it yet. / Fred-Chess 20:21, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Copyright Duration Directive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]