Talk:Counterinsurgency in Northern Afghanistan

September 2009, suggestion to wait for results of investigation of airstrike against captured civilian fuel-trucks

Dear author,

Please let me suggest to take other sources than the Noergelecke into account. For example the ZDF-news as of 04-Sep-09 or the official reports from Bundeswehr and ISAF of the same date.

Findings:

0) Noergelecke is not a trusted source of information. Responsibilities of the site are unclear. Probably, It is not a genuine source of independent information.

1) "fierce fighting" should not be used for an event which was an airstrike without involvement of ground-forces. The figure of casualties is unclear. the scope is from 56 Taliban (Bundeswehr-claim) to 90 (governor-claim, later corrected to about 50) with civilian of unknown number whilst Bundeswehr does not report that there were civilians affected.

2) The figures in the overview-box do not comply with revised figures any more. As so far you reported only minimum-consensus figurres, there are more than 50+ casualties confirmed and Bundeswehr claims all of them being Taliban.

13:59, 4 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.68.11.214 (talk)

The version of 27th of february is pure vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.11.6.209 (talk) 13:59, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Counterinsurgency in Northern Afghanistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090803022003/http://www.alertnet.org:80/thenews/newsdesk/LF519706.htm to http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/LF519706.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:00, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Linkage

Regarding the links I would request that none change the format for now. Unfortunately, the German military IT system is a nasty business. Getting along with these long links is terrible enough; until that's done, I would want the whole sources section to share the same simple, yet clear citation system without the template. 84.138.246.207 (talk) 01:46, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Counterinsurgency in Northern Afghanistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/world/07-dozens-killed-in-northern-afghanistan-attacks-ha-04
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://shape.nato.int/resources/1/documents/nato_at_war.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628212939/http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/uriks/article3031992.ece to http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/uriks/article3031992.ece
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100223205155/http://www.isaf.nato.int/en/article/isaf-releases/feb.-16-ansf-isaf-discover-weapons-cache-in-paktika-province.html to http://www.isaf.nato.int/en/article/isaf-releases/feb.-16-ansf-isaf-discover-weapons-cache-in-paktika-province.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721110524/http://www.kormany.hu/en/ministry-of-defence/news/succumbed-in-the-hardest-struggle-of-his-life to http://www.kormany.hu/en/ministry-of-defence/news/succumbed-in-the-hardest-struggle-of-his-life
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129042311/http://www.defense.gov/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=13947 to http://www.defense.gov/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=13947

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:24, 26 May 2017 (UTC)