Talk:Crew Dragon In-Flight Abort Test

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Crew Dragon In-Flight Abort Test article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Spaceflight: SpaceX working group Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by SpaceX working group.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[List of Falcon 9 first-stage boosters#B1046|B1046.4]] Anchor List of Falcon 9 first-stage boosters#B1046 links to a specific web page: Falcon 9 B1046. The anchor (#B1046) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Requested move 4 March 2020

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed. BD2412 T 03:48, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon 2 In-Flight Abort Test → Crew Dragon In-Flight Abort Test – Per Wikipedia's guidelines on consistent article titles, harmonising with Crew Dragon Demo-1 and Crew Dragon Demo-2. Also noting that this was a test of a Crew Dragon capsule specifically, and not of the broader Dragon 2 design. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 00:50, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- Support Per nomination reason. Ultimograph5 (talk) 01:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support seems to be the more common name elsewhere, too. --mfb (talk) 07:04, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others (and nom). --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 13:57, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

SpaceX insignia for the In-Flight Abort Test.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:37, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The space shuttle didn't have "Few feasible options" for abort

While the space shuttle did have areas where no abort/bailout was possible, especially before the Challenger disaster, the abort modes did exist and did not have any obvious issues with feasibility. The statement that the space shuttle had "few feasible abort options" should be removed because feasibility is a matter of opinion and the space shuttle had meticulously planned abort modes. Titan(moon)003 (talk) 22:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]