Talk:Crisis of the late 16th century in Russia

A fact from Crisis of the late 16th century in Russia appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 June 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that as a result of the crisis of the late 16th century in Russia, many service-class landowners were left with no peasants working their land?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Crisis of the late 16th century in Russia.

Wikipedia

Russia: History Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Livonian war#1578-1583: Swedish and Polish-Lithuanian dominance.2C truces|problems for Russia]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 20:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

~~... that oprichnina was considered by contemporaries and historians to be one of the causes of a severe socio-economic crisis of the late 16th century in Russia?~~ Source: Колычева, Евгения Ивановна (1987). Аграрный строй России XVI в. (in Russian). Наука. p. 181.
- ALT1: ... that as a result of the crisis of the late 16th century in Russia many service class landowners were sometimes left with no peasants working their land? Source: Turchin, Peter; Nefedov, Sergey A. (2009). Secular Cycles. p. 254. ISBN 9780691136967.
- ALT1a: ... that because of the crisis of the late 16th century many landowners in Russia sometimes had no people to work their land? --evrik ^(talk) 16:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- ALT2: ... that labourers' wages grew and taxes decreased in the aftermath of the crisis of the late 16th century in Russia? Source: Turchin, Peter; Nefedov, Sergey A. (2009). Secular Cycles. p. 254. ISBN 9780691136967.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/2021 ban of Palestinian human rights organizations

Created by Alaexis (talk). Self-nominated at 11:22, 27 April 2022 (UTC).[reply]

I am ready to complete the review. Can you clean-up the templates, and finish the DYK review? --evrik ^(talk) 18:38, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks evrik! I've finished the QPQ. Which clean-up templates should I remove? Alaexis_¿question? 13:15, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All of them. Also, it would be great if you transliterated the sources into Roman script. --evrik ^(talk) 15:23, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Probably I'm being slow but I don't see any such templates in the article or on this page, can you clarify? I'll transliterate the titles. Alaexis_¿question? 20:00, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"The population growth in the previous overpopulation[clarification needed] meant that the peasants had insufficient reserves and a famine ensued." --evrik ^(talk) 20:11, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I've fixed it. Alaexis_¿question? 11:55, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

Approving Alt1, offering Alt1a for the promoter --evrik ^(talk) 16:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]