Jump to content

Talk:Dælenenga idrettspark/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs) 12:33, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I shall review.

Infobox
Lead
History
  • Seems good, contains good information, references fine.
Facilities
  • Yep, good. "Ruter" may need explaining, but not required.
Events
  • The information included there is fine. The three tables are correctly formatted and are used correctly.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:


Pass. TAP 12:47, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for taking the time for both this and the other review. Arsenikk (talk) 15:01, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]